Research Statement



Research Statement

My research project focuses on Sherin Neshat an Iranian visual artist and the subjects attributed within her works of art hence the culture and religion depicted within the work. She was born in 1957 in Iran, but completed her studies in the filed of art in California, during that time of period, the Iranian revolution came about, which could have mainly inspired her work. Although She did not began creating art until her thirties, she is very much considered as one of the most important contemporary artist in the world. She is well known mainly for her video, photography and film work. 
When it comes to analyzing Shirin Neshat’s work of art one most look deep and consider her background, her work incorporates a lot of cultural, traditional, gender and religious content. Her work touches up on common communicational context considering loss, meaning and memory. She brings about the fundamental natures of the Islamic religion and encompasses them within the art.
           What I tried to focus on with my research was keeping up with showing the psychological experience of gender in the modern Islamic society which she uses as means sending out a message to the world concerning women in the Middle Eastern and Islamic nations within her perspective.
            The focal point of my research was trying to keep up with factual and historical events concerning anything in relation with Iran, women and Islam. It was not the easiest thing to do seeing as how the three subjects are not really the most art related types of matter.
What I enjoyed employing my research on the most was the subject of Islam.  Not only was there a lot that I didn’t know about it considering that it is my religion, but I didn’t know there was a lot of arena of artistic influence from such a faith.  
           My research narrowed down to the arts of the holy Quran and the architecture of the Mosques and the history behind it. Art in Islam consists of calligraphy and floral designs to decorate objects, embroidery and textile. Art in Islam is considered as aniconic art hence it does not incorporate any type of human figure but merely anionic ornament geography and arabesque calligraphy etc.  The art of writing is an importance aspect in Islamic art again they do not use iconic style so that’s all they’ve got to work with besides geometries, they elaborate on the calligraphy with predominate types of writing called Kufic and Cursive.  Illumination of the Qur’an with gold leaf and gold ink is another elaboration of art. As for the mosque is almost pretty much the same thing when it comes to decoration. The widely used type of decoration involve calligraphy, hypostyle, muqarnas vaulting (a strictly Islamic type of vaulting) which replaced Corinthian columns for the ancient roman times and finally intrinsic and mathematical geometry.
In conclusion it was a great experience putting this little research blog together, although I may not have elaborated on the design within the blog but I certainly have learned a lot throughout creating it. I had no idea that from one thing one can learn many other things, broadening our way of thought is quite a challenge. My love for my religion has grown I have learned to appreciate such intricate way of putting art together with just shapes and letters, its pretty amazing.  

Mid Term assignment


Fall 2010 Mid Term Exam
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              Sherin Neshat-Rapture

My artist’s of choice’s name is Shirin Neshat.  She is an Iranian visual artist who currently lives in New York.  She was born in 1957, but completed her studies in the filed of art in California, during her that, the Iranian revolution came about, which could have mainly inspired her work. Although She did not began creating art until her thirties, she is very much considered as one of the most important contemporary artist in the world. She is well known mainly for her video, photography and film work. 
Considering her background, her work integrates a lot of cultural, traditional, gender and religious content.  Her work touches up on collective communication considering loss, meaning and memory. She brings about the fundamental natures of the Islamic religion and incorporates within them an art. The concept behind her work Rapture, as she shows the psychological experience of gender in the modern Islamic society that is she is trying to send out a message to the world concerning women in the Middle Eastern and Islamic nations within her perspective.  She uses a lot of dark composition; she uses a lot of women in her work of art. Woman in Islam are a vital and critical subject to be brought up universal especially in the arts. It is so much talked about politically wise.
With Rapture Neshat created pure photography. Rapture is also a series of short films, but from them also come the photography. The first was created in 1999 and the second that I will interpret was created in 2001, it’s called Rapture, Women with Writing on Hands. The form of one piece of her artwork consisted of a group of women veiled in black abayat (traditional Islamic modest clothing) settled on the ground in what seemed to be in the middle of nowhere reaching out with their hands upwards with henna tattoos on their palms, in what seems to be Arabic or Farsi scripture. Another of her work depicts women once again all dressed in black abayat, scattered by the seashore facing it. Her photos are black and white, which tend to be very affective towards the viewer.
I don’t know what the message behind such photos is, but from what I see it, is that she is trying very hard to make the Muslim veiled women as oppressed and not of this world, as if they were from a backward world as if their in the urge to escape. She uses dark contrast; dark clothing and the women’s gestures bring negative thought to the viewer’s interpretation.  Considering the political issues in Iran the viewer can surpass the religious aspect, because not all Islamic nations “oppress” their women. I do not know much about the politics of Iran, but I do know that all the women when in public must cover themselves. She is depicting these women as refugees escaping from political and traditional arena that they are clustered within.
Also considering her personal experiences, of where she grew up, the changes that occurred during her life before and post Iranian revolution may very well have to do with the irrationality that she portrays in her pieces. As a woman from the Middle East herself I’m sure she has some sort of a personal relationship with her artwork. I do not know if she is a Muslim herself nowhere in my research did it come up. But perhaps she was, but because she was from an upper class westernized family, those specific secular groups within the pre-Iranian revolution were the ones who got afflicted the most during and after the war, perhaps after that she grew to detest the religion. In away she dedicated her artwork to expressing her thoughts and feelings.
              As I referred before the subject of her artwork are women, specifically Muslim women. But the focal point if her work emphasizes on gender and identity in the Islamic societies.  She uses deserted places as the background to contrast her focal point, for example what looked like an abandoned city, with its remains and mountains of stones scattered about that indicates its barrenness.  The other photograph of encompassed a wide spread at a standstill ocean, with a sky that was slightly furnished with a fog. These sorts of backgrounds just add in more emphasis on to the message she is trying to bring about. 
In conclusion it is always vital to look back at where the art was located, the culture and conditions that border it. This helps us understand the relationship this piece of work may have with its owner, otherwise one would be left at a loose end. Over all as a Muslim women myself I was touched by Neshat’s work, I found it interesting how each and every one of us looks a situation differently.

Ataurique

Fine architectural detail at the Alhambra Palace in Southern Spain.

Arabesque



 The arabesque is an artistic motif that is characterized by the application of repeating geometric forms and fancifully combined patterns; these forms often echo those of plants and animals. Arabesques are elements of Islamic art often found decorating the walls of mosques. The choice of which geometric forms are to be used and how they are to be formatted is based upon the Islamic view of the world. To Muslims, these forms, taken together, constitute an infinite pattern that extends beyond the visible material world. To many in the Islamic world, they concretely symbolize the infinite, and therefore uncentralized, nature of the creation of the one God (Allah). Furthermore, the Islamic Arabesque artist conveys a spirituality without the iconography of Christian art.

Quran in Persian Kufic Script

this is a folio from a Qur'an in which one can see the Kufic style of calligraphy















http://www.flickr.com/photos/horizon/266947343/

Andalus Quran

Mosque calligraphy


Islamic Mosque calligraphy is calligraphy that can be found in and out of a mosque, typically in combination with Arabesque motifs. Arabesque is a form of Islamic art known for its repetitive geometric forms creating beautiful decorations. These geometric shapes often include Arabic calligraphy written on walls and ceilings inside and outside of mosques.
The subject of these writings can be derived from different sources in Islam. It can be derived from the written words of the Qur'an or from the oral traditions relating to the words and deeds of Islamic Prophet Muhammad.
There is a beatiful harmony between the inscriptions and the functions of the mosque. Specific surahs (chapters) or ayats (verses) from Koran are inscribed in accordance with functions of specific architectural elements. For example, on the domes you can find the Nour ayat (the divine stress on light) written, above the main entrance you find verses related to the entrances of the paradise, on the windows the divine names of Allah are inscribed so that reflection of the sun rays through those windows remind the believer that Allah manifests Himself upon the universe in all high qualities.

Istanbul Suleymaniye Mosque
Commonly used in mosques:
Bismillah ir-Rahman ir-Rahim
Bismillah ir-Rahman ir-Rahim is the most common phrase found in mosques. It means: "In the name of God, most Gracious, most Compassionate."
Allah & Muhammad
Allah is Arabic for One God and Muhammad is the last of the prophets in Islam. Both Allah and Muhammad are almost always found inside mosques as a reminder of the religion's main beliefs..
It is also customary to see the names of four caliphs, Abu Bakr, Omar, Othman and Ali and also Hassan and Hussein, the grandsons of the Prophet Muhammad.
In the Ottoman mosques there are also calligraphic plates which contain verses, hadithes (Prophetic sayings), as well as exalted poetry

Islamic Calligraphy

Islamic calligraphy, colloquially known as Arabic calligraphy, is the artistic practice of handwriting, or calligraphy, and by extension, of bookmaking, in the lands sharing a common Islamic cultural heritage. This art form is based on the Arabic script, which for a long time was used by all Muslims in their respective languages. They used it to represent God because they denied representing God with images. Calligraphy is especially revered among Islamic arts since it was the primary means for the preservation of the Qur'an. Suspicion of figurative art as idolatrous led to calligraphy and abstract depictions becoming a major form of artistic expression in Islamic cultures, especially in religious contexts. The work of calligraphers was collected and appreciated.
Arabic, Persian and Ottoman Turkish calligraphy is associated with abstract arabesque motives on the walls and ceilings of mosques as well as on the page. Contemporary artists in the Islamic world draw on the heritage of calligraphy to use calligraphic inscriptions or abstractions in their work.

Calligraphy has arguably become the most venerated form of Islamic art because the Arabic script was the means of transmission of the Qur'an. The holy book of Islam, the Qur'an, has played an important role in the development and evolution of the Arabic language, and by extension, calligraphy in the Arabic alphabet. Proverbs and complete passages from the Qur'an are still active sources for Islamic calligraphy.
The different writing styles of the Arabic alphabet are generally divided between geometric scripts (basically Kufic and its variations) and cursive scripts (such as NaskhRuq'ahThuluth...)
Kufic is a cleaner, more geometric style, with a very visible rhythm and a stress on horizontal lines. Vowels are sometimes noted as red dots; consonants are distinguished with small dashes to make the texts more readable. A number of Qur'ans written in this style have been found in the Mosque at Kairouan, in Tunisia. Kufic writing also appears on ancient coins.
The Maghribi script and its Andalusi variant are less rigid versions of Kufic, with more curves.

Allah


Woman looking at the word Allah 
at Old Mosque in Edirne, Turkey.

Mihrab


 A mihrab is semicircular niche (architecture) in the wall of a mosque that indicates the qibla; that is, the direction of the Ka'ba in Mecca and hence the direction that Muslims should face when praying. The wall in which a mihrab appears is thus the "qibla wall."
Mihrabs should not be confused with the minbar, which is the raised platform from which an Imam (leader of prayer) addresses the congregation.

Cathedral–Mosque of Córdoba


 The Cathedral and former Great Mosque of Córdoba, in ecclesiastical terms the Catedral de Nuestra Señora de la Asunción (English: Cathedral of Our Lady of the Assumption), and known by the inhabitants of Córdoba as the Mezquita-Catedral   is today a World Heritage Site and the Cathedral of the diocese of Córdoba. The site was primarily a pagan temple, then a Visigothic Christian church, before the Umayyad Moors at first converted the building into a mosque, and then built a new mosque on the site.  It is located in the Andalusian city of Córdoba, Spain. The Mezquita is regarded as perhaps the most accomplished monument of the Umayyad Caliphate of Córdoba. After the Spanish Reconquista, it once again became a Roman Catholic church, with a plateresque cathedral later inserted into the centre of the large Moorish building.
The building was begun in approximately AD 600 as the Christian Visigothic church of St. Vincent. After the Islamic conquest of the Visigothic kingdom the Emir Abd ar-Rahman I bought the church.[3] Abd ar-Rahman I and his descendants reworked it over two centuries to refashion it as a mosque, starting in 784. Additionally, Abd ar-Rahman I used the mosque (originally called Aljama Mosque) as an adjunct to his palace and named it to honor his wife. Several explanations have been proposed to explain the mosque's unorthodox orientation. Traditionally, the mihrab of a mosque faces in the direction of Mecca; by facing the mihrab, worshipers pray towards Mecca. Mecca is east-southeast of the mosque, but the mihrab points south. Some have suggested the mihrab faces south because the foundations of the mosque were taken from the old Roman and Visigoth constructions. Others contend that Abd ar-Rahman oriented the mihrab southward as if he were still in the Ummayyad capital of Damascus and not in exile. Another possible explanation is that since the Cordoban emirate adopted the Maliki school of Islamic jurisprudence, and according to the authorities of this school and the jurists, the obliged prayers are still regarded as valid even if the prayer direction towards Mecca is tilted from the exact Meccan location by 89 degrees.
The mosque underwent numerous subsequent changes: Abd ar-Rahman III ordered a new minaret, while Al-Hakam II, in 961, enlarged the building and enriched the mihrab. The last of the reforms was carried out by Al-Mansur Ibn Abi Aamir in 987. It was connected to the Caliph's palace by a raised walk-way, mosques within the palaces being the tradition for the Islamic rulers of all times.

Lotfollah Mosque

Sheikh Lotf Allah Mosque is one of the architectural masterpieces of Safavid Iranian architecture, standing on the eastern side of Naghsh-i Jahan Square, Isfahan, Iran.
Construction of the mosque started in 1603 and was finished in 1618. It was built by the chief architect Shaykh Bahai, during the reigh of Shah Abbas I of the Safavid dynasty.

Selimiye Mosque, Dome

Islamic Architecture


Islamic architecture encompasses a wide range of both secular and religious styles from the foundation of Islam to the present day, influencing the design and construction of buildings and structures in Islamic culture. The principal Islamic architectural types are: the Mosque, the Tomb, the Palace and the Fort. From these four types, the vocabulary of Islamic architecture is derived and used for buildings of lesser importance such as public baths, fountains and domestic architecture 

Islamic art


 Islamic art encompasses the visual arts produced from the 7th century onwards by people (not necessarily Muslim) who lived within the territory that was inhabited by culturally Islamic populations. It includes fields as varied as architecture, calligraphy, painting, and ceramics, among others. Islamic art is not an art pertaining to religion only. The term "Islamic" refers not only to the religion, but to the rich and varied Islamic culture as well. Islamic art frequently adopts secular elements and elements that are frowned upon, if not forbidden, by some Islamic theologians.
Islamic art developed from many sources: Roman, Early Christian art, and Byzantine styles were taken over in early Islamic art and architecture; the influence of the Sassanian art of pre-Islamic Persia was of paramount significance; Central Asian styles were brought in with various nomadic incursions; and Chinese influences had an important effect on Islamic painting, pottery, and textiles."
There are repeating elements in Islamic art, such as the use of geometrical floral or vegetal designs in a repetition known as the arabesque. The arabesque in Islamic art is often used to symbolize the transcendent, indivisible and infinite nature of Allah.  

Islam


is the monotheistic religion articulated by the Qur’an, a text considered by its adherents to be the verbatim word of God, and by the teachings and normative example (called the Sunnah collected in the hadith) of Muhammad, the last Prophet of Islam. The word Islam means 'Submission (to God)',[ and an adherent of Islam is called a Muslim.
Muslims believe that God is one and incomparable. Muslims also believe that Islam is the complete and universal version of a primordial faith that was revealed at many times and places before, including through the prophets Abraham, Moses and Jesus. Muslims maintain that previous messages and revelations have been partially changed or corrupted over time,[3] but consider the Quran to be both unaltered and the final revelation from God. Religious practices include the Five Pillars of Islam, which are five obligatory acts of worship, and following Islamic law, which touches on virtually every aspect of life and society, encompassing everything from banking and welfare, to warfare and the environment.
The Muslims belong to two denominations, with the majority (c. 80-90%) practicing Sunni Islam and approximately 10-20% Shia Islam. About 13% of Muslims live in Indonesia, the largest Muslim country, 25% in South Asia, 20% in the Middle East, 2% in Central Asia, 4% in the remaining South East Asian countries, and 15% in Sub-saharan Africa. Sizable communities are also found in China and Russia, and parts of the Caribbean. Converts and immigrant communities are found in almost every part of the world. With about 1.57 billion Muslims comprising about 23% of the world's population, Islam is the second-largest religion and arguably the fastest-growing religion in the world.

History behind veiling


The first recorded instance of veiling for women is recorded in an Assyrian legal text from the 13th century BCE, which restricted its use to noble women and forbade prostitutes and common women from adopting it. The Mycenaean Greek term a-pu-ko-wo-ko meaning "craftsman of horse veil" written in Linear B syllabic script is also attested since ca. 1300 BC. Ancient Greek texts have also spoken of veiling and seclusion of women being practiced among the Persian elite. Statues from Persepolis depict women both veiled and unveiled, and it seems to be regarded as an attribute of prostitution under their belief.
Classical Greek and Hellenistic statues sometimes depict Greek women with both their head and face covered by a veil. Caroline Galt and Lloyd Llewellyn-Jones have both argued from such representations and literary references that it was commonplace for women (at least those of higher status) in ancient Greece to cover their hair and face in public.
For many centuries, until around 1175, Anglo-Saxon and then Anglo-Norman women, with the exception of young unmarried girls, wore veils that entirely covered their hair, and often their necks up to their chins (see wimple). Only in the Tudor period (1485), when hoods became increasingly popular, did veils of this type become less common.
For centuries, women have worn sheer veils, but only under certain circumstances. Sometimes a veil of this type was draped over and pinned to the bonnet or hat of a woman in mourning, especially at the funeral and during the subsequent period of "high mourning". They would also have been used, as an alternative to a mask, as a simple method of hiding the identity of a woman who was traveling to meet a lover, or doing anything she didn't want other people to find out about. More pragmatically, veils were also sometimes worn to protect the complexion from sun and wind damage (when un-tanned skin was fashionable), or to keep dust out of a woman's face, much as the keffiyeh is used today.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veil

Veiling


 A veil is an article of clothing, worn almost exclusively by women, that is intended to cover some part of the head or face.
One view is that as a religious item, it is intended to show honor to an object or space. The actual sociocultural, psychological, and sociosexual functions of veils have not been studied extensively but most likely include the maintenance of social distance and the communication of social status and cultural identity. In Islamic society, various forms of the veil have been adopted from the Arab culture in which Islam arose.

Iranian Revolution Historical Background


 Shi'a clergy (Ulema) have had a significant influence on some Iranians, who have tended to be religious, traditional, and alienated from any process of Westernization. The clergy first showed themselves to be a powerful political force in opposition to Iran's monarch with the 1891 Tobacco Protest boycott that effectively destroyed an unpopular concession granted by the Shah giving a British company a monopoly over buying and selling Tobacco in Iran.
Decades later monarchy and clerics clashed again, this time monarchy holding the upper hand. Shah Pahlavi's father, army general Reza Pahlavi, replaced Islamic laws with western ones, and forbade traditional Islamic clothing, separation of the sexes and veiling of women (hijab). Police forcibly removed and tore chadors of women who resisted his ban on public hijab. In 1935 dozens were killed and hundreds injured when a rebellion by pious Shi'a at the most holy Shi'a shrine in Iran [34] was crushed on his orders.
In 1941 Reza Shah was deposed and his son, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, installed by an invasion of allied British and Soviet troops. In 1953 foreign powers (American and British) again came to the Shah's aid. After the Shah fled the country an American CIA operative and aided by the British MI6 organized a military coup d'état to oust his nationalist and democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh.
Shah Pahlavi maintained a close relationship with the United States government, both regimes sharing a fear of/opposition to the expansion of Soviet/Russian state, Iran's powerful northern neighbor. Like his father's regime, Shah Pahlavi's was known for its autocracy, its focus on modernization and Westernization and for its disregard for religious and democratic measures in Iran's constitution. Leftist, nationalist and Islamist groups attacked his government (often from outside Iran as they were suppressed within) for violating the Iranian constitution, political corruption, and the political oppression by the SAVAK (secret police).

Protestors during the Iranian Revoltuion



Cause of the Iranian Revolution


The revolution was populist, nationalist and later Shi'a Islamic. It was in part a conservative backlash against the Westernizing and secularizing efforts of the Western-backed Shah, and a liberal backlash to social injustice and other shortcomings of the ancien régime. The Shah was perceived by many as beholden to — if not a puppet of — a non-Muslim Western power (the United States) whose culture was impacting that of Iran.
The Shah's regime was seen as oppressive, brutal, corrupt, and extravagant; it also suffered from basic functional failures — an over-ambitious economic program that brought economic bottlenecks, shortages and inflation. Security forces were unable to deal with protest and demonstrations; Iran was an overly centralized royal power structure. The extraordinarily large size of the anti-shah movement meant that there "were literally too many protesters to arrest", and that the security forces were overwhelmed.
That the revolution replaced monarchy and Shah Pahlavi with Islamism and Khomeini, rather than another leader and ideology, is credited in part to the spread of the Shia version of the Islamic revival that opposed Westernization, saw Ayatollah Khomeini as following in the footsteps of the beloved Shi'a Imam Husayn ibn Ali, and the Shah in those of Husayn's foe, the hated tyrant Yazid I. Also thought responsible was the underestimation of Khomeini's Islamist movement by both the Shah's regime — who considered them a minor threat compared to the Marxists and Islamic socialists— and by the secularist opponents of the regime — who thought the Khomeinists could be sidelined.

Iranian Revolution


 The Islamic Revolution also known as the Iranian Revolution or 1979 Revolution refers to events involving the overthrow of Iran's monarchy (Pahlavi dynasty) under Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi and its replacement with an Islamic republic under Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the leader of the revolution.
Demonstrations against the Shah began in January 1978. Between August and December 1978 strikes and demonstrations paralyzed the country. The Shah left Iran for exile in mid-January 1979, and in the resulting power vacuum two weeks later Ayatollah Khomeini returned to Tehran to a greeting by several million Iranians. The royal regime collapsed shortly after on February 11 when guerrillas and rebel troops overwhelmed troops loyal to the Shah in armed street fighting. Iran voted by national referendum to become an Islamic Republic on April 1, 1979, and to approve a new theocratic constitution whereby Khomeini became Supreme Leader of the country, in December 1979.
The revolution was unusual for the surprise it created throughout the world; it lacked many of the customary causes of revolution (defeat at war, a financial crisis, peasant rebellion, or disgruntled military); produced profound change at great speed; was massively popular; overthrew a regime heavily protected by a lavishly financed army and security services; and replaced a modernizing monarchy with a theocracy based on Guardianship of the Islamic Jurists. Its outcome — an Islamic Republic "under the guidance of an 80-year-old exiled religious scholar from Qom" — was, as one scholar put it, "clearly an occurrence that had to be explained.

Interview with Shirin Neshat

  U.S.-based Iranian artist Shirin Neshat has created a rich video series delving into the complex lives of women in her homeland. The series was exhibited at Faurschou Gallery, 798 Art Zone, Beijing, from 25 October 2008 to 18 January 2009. Mixing magic, tragedy, history and politics, the videos explore five female characters from Shahrnush Parsipur's magic-realist novel Women Without Men. As well as evoking some extraordinary tales of women in a culture few of us know much about, Neshat's videos trace the contours of a crucial turning point in Iran's recent past – the U.S. and British-backed overthrow of the country's democratically elected government in 1953.
Dan Edwards wrote about the exhibition for The Beijinger. In the course of writing that article, he interviewed Neshat in December 2008 about her video series.

Each of the five videos comprising Women Without Men is quite different in style, from the elliptical imagery of Mahdokht to the more realist approach ofFarokh Legha. Was Women Without Men conceived from the outset as a five-video series, and did you have a clear idea of how you wanted to approach each character when you started the series? The different approaches were mainly due to the distinctions between each of the characters. For example Mahdokht is a totally unworldly, or rather surrealistic character, whereas Farokh Legha is a very realistic and worldly character.

The novel Women Without Men was written in the style of magic-realism, and the writer clearly chose to divide her characters and their aspirations into everything from extremely realistic to extremely surrealistic. For example, Mahdokht has an obsession with fertility but is terrified of human sexuality, so she dreams of being integrated into nature, so like a tree she could sprout, produce seeds and then fertilize the world. Whereas Zarin, who is a prostitute, is mainly portrayed through her psychological problem, obsessing about her body and anorexia, and feelings of shame and sin that eventually lead her to a break down. So I basically took each woman's dilemma and tried to, in the best way I could, reveal her spiritual, psychological, social or sexual issues. And since each woman's problems and aspirations were different, I created totally different narratives and stylistic approaches. So in the end some of my characters are less realistic than others.



For those of us not familiar with Shahrnush Parsipur's novel, can you tell us a little about it? Does the novel unfold as a series of discreet stories, or are the stories of different characters intertwined in the novel?
Originally Ms. Parsipur began writing the stories as separate and unrelated chapters, but at some point she decided to connect the different chapters together and make them into one story. So each woman begins in the city of Tehran and eventually ends up in the countryside in an orchard, where they end up living together and creating a rather utopian community.
I have to admit that I took a lot of liberties in my interpretation of the novel, and made a lot of changes to the narrative and construction of the women's characters, although in principalthey are quite close.
In the feature version of my project, which will be a 90 minute film, I make a clear cinematicnarrative. Although the story is at times quite different to the novel, for the most part,philosophically the feature film remains truthful to the message of the novel.
In the videos, which were mainly designed to be experienced in galleries or museum settings, my approach was far less narrative, and more conceptual in terms of not really trying to tell the entire story of each character, but rather give a glimpse into the nature of each woman. So by the time the viewer has visited all the rooms and seen each woman, he or she could put the story-puzzle together.
In the videos, I remain very close to the novel in portraying each woman's primary crisis, butthe way their story is told is quite different. They become highly conceptual. To give you anexample, Faezeh in the book and in my video is a traditional woman whose dreams of marriage and children are shattered because of rape. Similarly Munis' characterization remains just like in the novel, where she finds freedom through her flight, or suicide, since she is trapped by her family and forbidden to have direct experience of the social movements outside her home.



What was it that drew you to Shahrnush Parsipur's work?
I have known Shahrnush Parsipur's work for a long time, as she is one of the foremost important contemporary female writers in Iran, although she now lives in the U.S. in exile. It was in 2002, as I was dreaming of experimenting with making a long film, that I thought it might be best to think of an existing narrative, as opposed to writing an original script. Parsipur's style fit my work perfectly as she is known for her surrealistic literature. Like myself, her work seems to navigate somewhere between reality and magic. In other words, all her work has one foot in society, history and politics, but is also profoundly timeless, philosophical and universal in expression. So ultimately her writing has both local and global values, which is rare for Iranian literature. Most importantly her stories are always told through female characters just like myself. So as someone who was not interested in making a conventional film, I chose to work with Women Without Men in early 2003.

Has Parsipur been directly involved in your project at all?
Yes, she actually played the role of the Madame in the brothel [in the Zarin video].  She hasbeen on every trip to Morocco with us, where we shot the series. Although I did not want her to get involved with the adaptation of the novel into a script – this is apparently never a goodidea – she was always a consultant, and sometimes I asked her to write dialogue throughout the time we were writing the script.

The Munis and Farokh videos in particular seem to evoke the deposing of Doctor Mossadegh's government in 1953 as a buried history and a lost opportunity for Iran. Was a desire to revisit the 1953 coup, and the West's involvement in that event, part of what drew you to this project?
Yes, it was. As an Iranian, I've been very perplexed by the perception of Iranian culture byAmericans ever since the Islamic revolution, and I found I wanted to return to this historicalmoment and touch on how the American government had direct relation to the overthrow of ademocratic government, which eventually led to the deep resentment of Iranians against Americans, and indeed paved the road for the Islamic revolution. I had no interest in making a documentary film or an approach that would be a history lesson, but rather I found it interesting and a hallenge to build events as a background to my story. In the feature, this historical aspect of the period is far more highlighted than in the videos.


Mossadegh's government is mainly known for having attempted to nationalize Iran's oil industry. Did his government also represent the possibility of improving women's lives in Iran?
As far as I understand, Dr. Mossadegh was a modern man with very progressive views regarding women. He was educated in the West, he was an intellectual and religion played little role in his ideology. If you look back to his time of government, you see a very sophisticated society with far more equality between men and women, not only in relation to government but also the cultural life of Iran.

What motivated your decision to leave parts of the videos untranslated?
The translation has been quite selective. There are moments in the videos that we havetranslated, and then there are moments that I found rather obvious and didn't feel a literaltranslation was appropriate. To give you examples, Munis' conversation with the deadrevolutionary is translated, but her fight with her brother is not. When Faezeh comes to theorchard, her brief conversation with Munis is not translated but her whispers to herself are. In the Farokh Legha video, I believe everything is translated.

Is the Women Without Men video series now complete, and can you tell me about the feature version of the project?
As I mentioned earlier, Women Without Men was conceived as two-fold project: a feature film made for cinemas, and a series of five video installations exclusively designed for museums and galleries. I have now finished the videos and I'm completing the feature film. I have been very interested in how the experience of viewing the story may change completely due to the setting – a theatre versus a gallery or museum space. So in my construction and editing of the videos and the film, I've tried to address this issue. So once I finish the feature itwill be up to the audience to draw parallels and distinctions between art and cinema.

Will the feature film version of Women Without Men use the same actors that appear in your videos, or will the characters be played by different women? Similarly, is the feature being shot on the same locations? The feature film was shot in 2007 with same actors as the videos. And of course the locations are the same. But I must explain that Mahdokht, who is the most magic character both in the novel and in my videos, was eliminated in the feature. I felt the character was too extreme, and that between Munis and Zarin we had enough surrealistic material.

Where were the videos and feature shot? Presumably you were not able to shoot in Iran itself? Mahdokht and Zarin were shot in the city of Marrakech, and the remaining videos and the feature were all shot in Casablanca, which are both in Morocco. As you guessed, I could have never received permission to shoot this film in Iran; the book is banned and there are way too many sexual and political scenes in the film.

Do you know when the feature film will be completed?
We have one more week of editing left [this was in mid-December 2008]. We are currentlysubmitting the film to festivals so we will soon find out where it will premiere, but it should be out in 2009.

http://www.danedwards.net/Home/interviews/interview-with-shirin-neshat

Women Without Men

http://www.womenwithoutmenfilm.com/

Article


The exotic and the everyday

Shirin Neshat's startling films take life in Iran and turn it into something poetic. She tells Richard Williams about her new work

Art galleries are normally places of private contemplation and reaction. When three of Shirin Neshat's short films were shown at the Serpentine Gallery two years ago, however, the response was very different. People lingered in front of the screens, transfixed by not just the austere beauty of the images but the intensity and directness of the emotional charge they conveyed and, for western viewers, the sudden insights they provided into the complexities of Islam's relationship with itself and with the modern world.
"That was one of the most satisfying experiences I've had," says the Iranian artist as she prepares to leave her New York home for the performances of a new work, Logic of the Birds, which opens a six-night run at London's Union Chapel next week. "I've never had such a diverse public. I was there for a couple of weekends and you had Arabs coming in, artists coming in, people out walking in Hyde Park who came in - and their attention span was amazing. It made me feel that for my work, London is the best place."
Although they required actors, singers and crew, the three films - Turbulent, Rapture and Fervour - seemed very clearly the work of a single controlling intelligence. But in Logic of the Birds, already seen this year in New York and Minneapolis, Neshat is joined at the top of the credits by three of her regular collaborators, all fellow Iranian exiles in New York: the singer Sussan Deyhim, the film-maker and cinematographer Ghasem Ebrahimian, and the writer and film-maker Shoja Azari, who is also Neshat's partner. "This is four people's vision combined into one," Neshat says, "and an experiment for all of us."
Neshat left Iran in 1974, aged 17, to study art at the University of California in Berkeley. Most of her contemporaries were sent to Europe and were expected to get married before they could complete their studies. "My father was a doctor, but he was what I would call an intellectual - very well-read and very interested in knowledge. He insisted that I get as much education as my brothers." The revolution meant that she was unable to return to Iran until 1990, and it was only then that her career as an artist began. "Until then," she says, "I felt I had nothing to contribute."
Between 1993 and 1997 she produced a widely noticed series of black and white photographs called Women of Allah, in which she superimposed Farsi calligraphy on the hands and faces of her subjects, some of whom were carrying guns. Soon she transferred her concerns and her aesthetic sensibility to film, and her reputation was made in 1999 when Turbulent won the international prize at the Venice Biennale. British audiences first saw it installed in a church in the City of London before it became part of the Serpentine show. Her latest film, titled Tooba, received its premiere at the Documenta festival in Germany this summer before becoming the first of her pieces to be shown in her native country, at an exhibition in Tehran's Museum of Contemporary Art.
Like Tooba, Logic of the Birds finds Neshat moving away from her familiar black and white into colour. Based on The Conference of the Birds, a fable by the 12th-century Sufi poet and philosopher Farid al'Din Attar, the hour-long piece incorporates film, music and live staging. "We were interested in experimenting with the idea of bringing film-making and live performance closer together, to the point where the narrative is conveyed through the film but is also unfolded on the stage."
In Attar's poem a female bird leads her sceptical fellows off in search of a mythical ruler of their kingdom. "It's about reflection and self-discovery, and it's about looking within yourself to find leadership; it also has a feminist twist because the main bird is female. We wanted to make a piece that touched on some of the philosophical aspects of the story without attempting to make a literal translation of an epic text. Here, we're interested in the mystical aspect of the story, touching on the notion of this crowd looking for a saviour. They're travelling to look for a leader, but essentially they should be looking inside, not outside."
The political and social condition of Iran is again the focus. "You could relate this story to a country anywhere in the world, but in our country we're always waiting for a leader to come and save us, and there's a perpetual sense of betrayal. Ultimately, then, that's not where you should be looking. The story is about individuality, identity, uniqueness. The dynamic of the mass versus the individual is at the heart of the poem. In parts of the Islamic world today the notion of individuality has become very problematic."
There are no birds in this version of the story, but the main character, leading a flock on a mysterious journey, is played on the screen and on the stage by Deyhim, whose extra- ordinary improvised ululations dominated Turbulent. Deyhim and Neshat began their collaboration only four years ago, but they had met many years earlier in California.
"She was a dancer then, and I was just mesmerised by her. I was pretty conventional in those days, a typical Californian-Iranian girl, but she was so radical in her work that I was like, wow. Many years later I was living in New York and I saw a poster advertising her concert. I went along and I was blown away by how she had transformed herself from a dancer into an improvisational singer.
"Once we found each other again, we somehow clicked. We've both spent many years outside Iran, we both had a pretty wild lifestyle, an independent life away from our families, and we had to go through all sorts of channels to survive. And yet we're so interested in where we come from, and proud of it, and we're looking for a language that's a hybrid of the traditional and the modern.
"When I met her again she had just moved to New York from London with Richard Horowitz, her collaborator. I was thinking about making Turbulent, and I got introduced to Shoja and Ghasem around the same time. The whole group came together in that project and since then we've been more or less inseparable. It wasn't just a question of bringing our different experiences to what we could create as a work of art, but also of the need that we had as Iranians to create a sense of community, a home. We wanted to be around each other and the art was an excuse to continue the relationship."
Despite her involvement in the fate of her own people, two years ago Neshat was still able to say, in an interview with Time magazine: "I'm an artist, so I'm not an activist. I don't have an agenda." But while she and her partners were preparing Logic of the Birds, September 11 happened a few hundred yards down the street from her SoHo loft. Since then the west's attitude to Islam has become rather more difficult, and her view of her own role has changed.
"I'm beginning to feel that activism isn't such a bad thing," she says now. "I'm really interested in social justice, and if an artist has a certain power of being heard and voicing something important, it's right to do it. It could still be done in such a way that it's not aggressive or overly didactic. I'm trying to find that form."
She regretted that the attacks had not raised America's consciousness. "Instead we're faced with an increasing sense of ignorant, simplistic patriotism that reiterates a deep sense of arrogance. What has happened in Palestine in recent months, with the Americans giving carte blanche to Israel to destroy a nation, is unforgivable. If Palestine had oil, of course, they would have been worth defending, but they have nothing and therefore Americans feel no need of humanitarian justice.
'In Iraq we're faced once again with the hypocrisy of a government that misleads its people and the world in saying one thing but meaning another. Most of us know that the removal of Saddam Hussein is essentially not the aim, which is gaining access to the oil and Republicans winning an election. Of course I don't support corrupt Islamic governments but I care about the Muslims and how the economic and political pressures have created a volatile situation both inside and outside their countries. Ultimately, fundamentalism and terrorism breed in such an environment."
It would be bound to affect her work, she says, even if the treatment remained at a symbolic level. "It could be something very metaphoric, very abstract. I've been careful in all my exploration of this subject not to point fingers, but I feel it's almost come to the point where that lack of a position is itself taking a position. So I'll make work that may touch on the absurdity and hypocrisy at both ends and reveal how vulnerable yet powerful an individual may be in taking charge of their own destiny and refusing to be controlled spiritually, morally and politically."
The westerner looking at her pieces will almost certainly not see what an Iranian sees. "Sometimes it's almost as if they're totally opposite," she says. But no one could miss the real point. However abstracted and metaphoric the approach may be, however ravishingly exotic the sights and sounds, the struggle of individuals claiming the right to control their own destiny and identity is what compels the gaze.
Logic of the Birds is at the Union Chapel, London N1, November 6-9, 11 and 12. Box office: 08700 600 100 or www.ticketweb.co.uk.
Information: www.artangel.org.uk.